When U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer appeared before the Ways and Means Committee on May 22 to discuss President Trump’s trade agenda, I had the opportunity to ask him about a number of agriculture trade priorities.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
When U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer appeared before the Ways and Means Committee on May 22 to discuss President Trump’s trade agenda, I had the opportunity to ask him about a number of agriculture trade priorities.
To start, I emphasized the importance of NAFTA to Nebraska agriculture. Many Third District producers have reached out to me with deep concerns about disruptions to NAFTA, and I have repeatedly taken these concerns to the Trump administration.
Ambassador Lighthizer’s responses to our Committee showed the administration is listening and gave me confidence in his commitment to not undermine NAFTA’s successes. We can certainly take a look at this 25-year-old agreement to see where modernizations can be made, but the current market access granted to U.S. exporters must be the baseline for any renegotiation.